New Zealand
Local Democracy Reporting

'This is wrong': Local Auckland boards oppose pool privatisation

August 1, 2024
The Papatoetoe, Mangere and Otara pools are examples of council-led facilities that Apulu Reece Autagavaia says the community appreciates and wants to support.

Auckland Council will decide today whether to hand its pools and leisure centres over to private businesses, despite all the chairs of Tāmaki Makaurau's local boards opposing the move.

Apulu Reece Autagavaia, the chairperson of the Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Board, said the boards wrote to the council boss, mayor and councillors to say "this is wrong".

"These are local community facilities that are governed by local boards.

"We are the governors of these facilities, therefore the decision should come back to us. We're the ones that know our local communities best and to have a regional committee or staff members make this decision on behalf of our communities takes away localism."

The council recently completed its review how the city's pools and leisure centres were being managed and, on July 24, held a workshop to discuss the options, Today, it will decide.

Apulu Reece Autagavaia said that affordable access to leisure centres and pools is important to our communities.

But Apulu said the process lacked vital public consultation

"We need to ensure that our local people can have their views and also have their views heard but also reflected in the decisions that are made for the city."

Ōtara, Papatoetoe, and Māngere have council-run facilities in South Auckland, which regular feedback showed the community appreciated and supported, he said.

"We can see within our own ward, the difference between a council-run facility compared to a private one. And that's reflected in the public surveys that council regularly does… the privately run ones, there's a drop in service and again, a drop in confidence by our communities."

Private operators will make profits by either increasing the prices or diminishing the services, Apulu added. He foresaw those small charges would hit the Pacific and Māori communities the hardest.

"We already see that with central governments, with things like $5 prescription fees, public transport. So all those things might seem small and probably insignificant to more affluent families but when you add them all up, it's a significant amount for our communities in South Auckland."

Max Hardy, Auckland Council director of group strategy, said the council was reviewing how its 42 pools and leisure centres were managed.

"We are not looking at 'selling off or privatising' the council's pool and leisure centres. They will remain important council services and in council ownership. However, the review explores other operating models, including options for private operators managing services."

However, Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board chair Tauanu'u Nick Bakulich was worried about the instability and lack of information.

Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Board chairperson Apulu Reece Autagavaia says the local community facilities are governed by local boards.

"It's very unclear and uncertain the future around the staff of our pools and recreation centres. So there's no guarantee as far as we're concerned. We don't see a guarantee of their working future."

He strongly opposed the proposal to privatise services, especially during challenging times when the community was already struggling with the cost of living.

"If they're going to make such a significant change, why is it that it hasn't been put into the public space? I mean these spaces are largely funded by the ratepayer and I would imagine that the ratepayer should have a right to be consulted.

"As we know, once you start privatising all of our assets, it can be very hard to reverse that."

Will Flavell, the deputy chair of the Henderson-Massey Local Board, also opposed the out-sourcing of management for aquatic centres.

"Personally, I'm vehemently against the privatisation of our aquatic centres," he said, stressing the importance of keeping them under Auckland Council's control.

"Privatisation means the willingness for companies to make a profit and I think that should not be the priority of our aquatic centres, so we're definitely against it.

"If you privatise it, the main aim is to make a profit, and I don't believe in that.

"Our local board does not support privatisation of our aquatic centres. We need to keep it in council's hands. It's a public facility."

By Mary Afemata of LDR

LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air

SHARE ME

More Stories